Section 2302 (b) The conviction of the Qatil-e-Amad evidence, the reduction in the FIR was immediately filed. Was. The ocular evidence for false interference with the accused in this case agreed with all material details regarding the role assigned to the accused, the close relationship of the witnesses with the deceased could not diminish their testimony, which they believed was medical evidence. Had supported the ocular account by the accused in his statement filed under section 2342, CCPC, the accused's special court was called, which led him to shoot the deceased under grave and sudden provocation. Was not confirmed because the deceased was convicted under the law, also nominated four other accused. had gone. In the FIR and private complaint by the complainant, three of whom were the accused accused, the firearm wound and the fourth co-accused were declared guilty by Lalakara Syed and the accused was acquitted by the trial court. And his fate was either not challenged by the complainant or the state's recovery of the pistol was not possible with the example of the accused. Do not endorse the ocular evidence as no crime was acquitted on the spot, such tense circumstances suggested that the trial of the accused was not a death sentence, the death sentence of the accused was changed to life imprisonment. Was.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
