Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed's appreciation of the evidence, the reduction of the presence of the prosecution witnesses at the location of the incident was fully established, their relationship with the deceased, further suggesting that the house with the deceased. His presence was a natural witness to all the material aspects of the case, even after a lengthy investigation into the minute details of the incident were not trivial. It did not affect the straightforward, coherent and naturalistic narrative of the entire incident. Along with the recovery of medical evidence and the weapons of crime, positive reports of the Chemical Examiner and the serologist have emerged. Your case has been proved. The shadow of any suspicion to uphold his conviction under Section 2302 (b), PPC, however, was mildly considered in this case under some controlling circumstances. The prosecution's case was that the accused had injured his own person during the incident, while the accused had accused him. Police Medico's legal report alleged that the injured were examined on the same day and that the injuries were fresh, and some fighting records indicate that the victim and others were the same. Were sleeping on the bed. The other person could not be presented as to what had actually happened between the accused and the suspect, who remained in the police at the time of the incident, even after the suspect's medico legal examination, mysteriously arresting him. Delayed for five days, in all these aspects, there were circumstances in favor of the accused, the prosecution.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
