The complainant himself did not see the benefit of suspicion of section 2 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence, but upon reaching it was informed by some that the accused had fired at his deceased brother, who had admitted the evidence. He had not seen any of the accused, nor had any knowledge of their whereabouts, so the FIR has given suspicion of the prosecution's story by giving full details of their names and their identities. Confirmation of the possibility of consultation, consideration and a preliminary inquiry is confirmed. Prior to the filing of the FLR, the case appeared as a second witness to the complainant's son, whose testimony did not prove through an independent source of unidentified character that the so-called eyewitnesses and their witnesses In the absence of any enmity between. The lonely accused could not seal his evidence truthfully under certain circumstances Medical evidence did not confirm the ocular testimony Pistol, the weapon of crime, eighteen days after the roadside incident in the partially populated area, Not accessible to the general public, the prosecution's case was full of doubts, the benefit of every doubt, even the slightest, had to go to the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
