Refusing to record the statement under Section 164 of the Constitution, Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, the PC Petition dismissed the order of the Sessions Judge, under which he rejected this statement of the Magistrate under section 1 under Maintained that CRPC had the power to record a virtual statement arbitrarily if the Magistrate discovered corruption in order to obtain such permission to record such statement, he had no It was not his duty to record the same applicant who sought permission to record his statement in any district other than his own district of residence. Had failed to do. Seeing the applicant was clearly a refusal of the magistrate's refusal to record the statement and the session judge was not subject to any illegal interference in guaranteeing the intervention of the High Court, dismissing the constitutional petition in the circumstances. Gone \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011