MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus INSPECTOR JAWED AHMED FAROOQI
Sections 173 and 561 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Fraud, Criminal Violation in Confidence, and Termination of Case in the Commonwealth Column \ C in Further by Judicial Magistrate The scope of the inquiry police was that the order was canceled by the Judicial Magistrate and the inquiry could not be initiated until the order on the charge sheet submitted under Section 173, CRPC was approved. If done, the police can take action. If a fresh investigation of any case is found to be unsatisfactory for valid and honorable reasons after submitting and accepting the first and final report, the same police officer or his superior officer cannot restore a pre-inquiry received further. Another inquiry may be made by the police on the information. In the present case, in the form of evidence and at the end of the investigation, the crime was not dealt with by the accused in submitting the charge sheet, in the present case, the previous investigation was irrational, arbitrary, cunning and dishonest. Because it was not done in this way to bring the truth to the surface. Investigation can only be intervened to protect the fundamental and legal right of the parties to protect the innocent from trial or the defendant cannot indicate that the investigation is not transparent, where economic stability and excessive jurisdiction existed. Nor is it subject to any illegal action. Or irregularities or that were executed in a baseless manner or without a jurisdiction that the constitutional application was permanent and was rejected under the circumstances. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
