Section 9 (c) was also prepared by the Chemical Analyst's report on evidence of drug possession and trafficking, which proved that the parcel sent to him contained physical possession and / or drug paraphernalia. Constructive possession, he made the owner punishable, not necessarily a physical truck, driven by the accused, was found to be full of sanctions, denied possession with the accused. The driver, who was controlling the truck, disputed that the driver's license was not recovered from the possession of the accused, he could not be declared a driver of the truck. A fence, driving a truck that was running was an art that was said and was not found with this license, which can only work out the legal authority of the law of a vehicle without a driving license. The vehicle dispute is that the accused was not the owner of the vehicle, not viable, because the suspect was found to be controlling the vehicle, which was loaded with prohibited material, the driver, who was the original occupant of the vehicle and the equipment, responsible. Yes, the owner may be guilty in some cases, but not necessarily the witnesses in each case being the office of the Excise Department, as good as others were, and they could not be found. Be pushed aside simply because of their officials, the witnesses can be denied, if they are shown to be immoral and / or interested, in the absence of such motives, Not to be outraged, the testimony of the defendants' testimony was not supported by any evidence, as it had nothing to do with it.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
