Sections 15 and 2 (h) of the Law on Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 2 (1) (C), 132 (2) and 117 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The premises for the termination of tenants, a hotel lease The contract was ordered to evict the tenant's personal need for the default rent payment The landlord's assessment was bound to prove the fact that the provisions of the relevant rules apply to the premises. When the tenant denied that the underground building was not a building. The landlord did not provide any evidence to provide evidence that the premises were abandoned for any purpose other than the hotel, and later the tenant's search for jurisdiction was contrary to that evidence. Which resulted in misinterpretation and non-reading. The jurisdiction of the evidence controller was withheld, as the facts of the present case had no jurisdiction to rent a hotel in the premises about which the eviction request was to be entertained. The courts below not only disregarded the landlord's evidence, but also failed to properly interpret the contents of the lease agreement. The evidence related to the concurrence of both courts was not based on proper scrutiny of the evidence and the application of the law. The law of evidence kept on record by the tenant is incorrectly enforced that the courts below should have judged on the basis of documentary evidence that the premises were always a hotel contrary to the results they found. Which was later changed. A hotel that neither owns
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
