GHULAM FARID MEMON versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY
Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the OI, R 10 suit moved the cause for action and the scope defendants to file a lawsuit as a necessary party to the decision on the basis that the suit respondents. They are the owners of this owner. The application for property was granted and the plaintiff was instructed to file the amended plaintiff in which only the amended title was entered and the amended to obtain any relief against the newly executed defendants. The claimant was not listed. The defendants conceded that the property was transferred in their favor. If he is displeased with the claimant's claim, he has filed an amendment claim even though rural property status could not be granted because the plaintiff had to claim the declaration in respect of his personal right to the property, Had he been denied by anybody, the plaintiff had not been upset with the denial of any existing right in his favor, which could also be regularly awarded for the rights of the land which he claimed was in his possession. The plaintiff has no proprietary rights, nor is there any such risk; he was not entitled to demand any declaration of proprietary rights in this regard. The present suit was filed by the auction of public land which had already been granted to the defendants in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff occupied the suit property at a particular time due to the cause of action against the defendant. / Presented without date The claim of the plaintiff has been erased The facts are that the defendants were the owners of the suit land and despite such information / information the plaintiff has filed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
