Section 2302 (b) Qatil Amad appreciated the evidence, neither stated in the FIR nor in the witness box that the defendant had entered the scene of the incident and that the other witness had made dishonest improvements in this regard. The statement was suspected that the identity could be misidentified. In the dark of the night outside the accused room where no source of light has been described or proven, cannot be ruled out, the two site plans contradicted the shooting location by the accused prosecution version that the victim was killed inside. was done. In the room, it was suspected that the prosecution witnesses arrived at the hospital after receiving information about the killing of the victim, after which the entire operation was recorded, no witnesses were identified at the time of post mortem examination. ? The pistol was also suspected on the defendant's offer, one of the heirs, the defendant's submission of the plea agreement, to increase the crime, he did not prove the accused's guilt, as he moved any such request Did not trust the prosecution's evidence, the trial court failed to evaluate the evidence on record in its original context, it was alleged that he was in bad condition.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
