During the interim examination of the Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract of sale to the witnesses of the contract, the appellate court correctly found that the seller's contracts were properly executed and the evidence I was proved, at the time of the execution of the contract, the property, was standing. In the interest of the defendants, the name of the predecessor, who had passed through the confession of the property, after the death of the foreclosure mentioned in the interest, automatically stood up to the legal heirs / defendants who became the owners and entered into the law. The change in the contract of sale to the plaintiffs in favor of the plaintiffs was recorded only on an existing fact and the absence of it could not deny the impression that their authenticity was compromised, which led to the evidence. That did not affect the authenticity of the sale agreement. The court was based on proper scrutiny of the evidence and did not demand interference, so the review was dismissed, according to Ed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
