Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL SHAH versus STATE


Section 35, 382B and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 109 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 accused several convicts under trial Section 109/302, pp. Punished under C and Anti-Section 7. Terrorism Act 1997, and both offenders were sentenced to life imprisonment. The accused's argument was that the convictions imposed should be ordered to run concurrently. The accused was given the benefit of the provisions of Section 382B, CR PC but is nowhere given in these decisions. The trial court, as well as the Supreme Court, had directed that the quantities of the convictions be executed simultaneously / simultaneously, the High Court directed the jail authorities to reduce the amount of convictions for each offense simultaneously. Count with the benefits of time provisions. According to Section 382B, CRPC, which had already been applied to the accused, it was allowed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Kandiaro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.