Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, Rr 100 (2) and 101 and Section 151 sued the plaintiffs for specific performance of the contract to sell the property and filed a written statement, the trial court The plaintiff obtained the plaintiff's case and seized it. Controversial property Another person (who had possession of the property) filed an application under OXI, RR 100 & 101- 151, in the court executing with CPC on the basis that He was unlawfully deposed and the decree passed in favor of the plaintiff. Not just for the specific performance of the sale agreement and for the possession of the disputed property. The executing court granted the request of the other person and ordered him to be restored to his possession. The plaintiff hanged the court and filed an appeal against the order which the plaintiff dismissed. The word `Investigation O XXI, R 100 (2), is used in CPC and so it was necessary for the execution court to decide the matter only if the court acting on the proof of proof. This claim has to be investigated when there was not enough material available on the record and if that material was available then the executing court would not be obliged to record the evidence. The defendants would be restored by the court and it was not necessary that the possession be To own The construction of the decree indicates that no ownership order was approved in favor of the plaintiff, or that the plaintiff did not accept the decree or applied for a correction warrant. During the execution of the decree, the QC was executed by the court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
