Find a Lawyer

BILAL AHMAD versus ABDUL RAZAQ

A. XXXIX, R1 Specific Relief Act (in 1877), Order XX XR R1 and 2, Section 12 Suit for Specific Performance of Contract for Sale of Interim Order of Property under CPC, Defendant In order to satisfy the defendants in order to withhold further property related to the suit grant by the vendor, the court must be bound to deposit money in the sale of the balance so that the order of the court during the placing of such condition on the defendant. It is legal to give such an order.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Raja AMIR-UR-REHMAN v. Raja KAMRAN AFZAL 2011 YLR 2738
• MUHAMMAD EHSAN-UL-HAQ v. MUHAMMAD TARIQ AYYUB 2011 YLR 2740
• IFTIKHAR AHMAD v. State 2011 YLR 2747
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. IRSHAD ALI 2011 YLR 2764
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. State 2011 YLR 2771
• ALI SHAN v. FAZAL DIN 2011 YLR 2773
• Syed GHAUS MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SAHIWAL 2011 YLR 2778
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT MULTAN 2011 YLR 2780

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

advocate from Lalshanra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes