Section 36 and Spec 36 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the auctioneer's cancellation of the sale of public land by the auctioneers, the plaintiffs foreclosed the highest bid for the purchase of suit land by the Board of Revenue. After confirming the sale and submitting the full value of the plaintiff's suit land sale, the auction buyer spent a large sum of money to develop the suit land level, but the canal authorities acquired the suit. Was declared non-commander and water was not available as irrigation announced. The plaintiffs' department forecasters, praying that since the land could not be cultivated, it had to be adjusted with alternative land or its money, without consulting the forecast, would be incurred on this Land Commissioner Soto Moto. Along with his money should be returned to him. The plaintiffs, canceling the ownership of the suit land, were not unilaterally entitled to cancel the land in the name of foreclosure or one of the defendants once under the scheme of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912. If the property rights of the land were transferred, it can only be revoked under the powers granted under section 30 (2) of the said Act. In the present case, it was not alleged that the auction was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation. The authorities did not have the power to revoke the proprietary rights of the land which was once granted to the plaintiff's predecessor, when an order was granted without jurisdiction, it was illegal and in the way of such person. There will not be a ceiling against which such an order has been passed. When a b
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
