Section 2302 (b) / Q 34 is convincing evidence that no one noticed that the case was told by the police two days later that the explanation presented by the prosecution was neither valid nor valid due to the said delay. Nor did the extra-judicial confession given by the accused in the trust release the panchayat in open proceedings before so many persons and without any arrest, it did not appeal to the petitioner for such confession, even otherwise. , Was always considered a very weak type of evidence that the controversial articles recovered from the accused were planted. Thereafter, no specific role was assigned to the accused to stabilize the prosecution's case. Medical evidence did not support the prosecution's version. The accused was involved in the case only on suspicion, causing him Can't be sentenced and sentenced. There was no legal evidence on record to make any allegations and allegations that we should associate the accused with the crime we are accused of.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
