Find a Lawyer

TREAT CORPORATION LTD. versus ELMAC LTD.

Sections 7 and 10 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), with the approval of certain permits by the unauthorized contracting authorities of Section 21, cannot be allowed to validate the specific performance of a document where the parties intend Unless the contract was confirmed by a third party, the agreement was not a final agreement and was merely an understanding, which was not enforceable by law, as both parties failed to obtain the required authorization. So that they could be successful in settling an agreement that the plaintiff failed to establish a lawsuit. N capable of implementing the trial court entered a definitive agreement between the parties. The lawsuit filed by the plaintiff's appeal was rightly dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ANEES v. State 2011 YLR 2805
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR ANSARI v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD through Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan 2011 YLR 2810
• Mst. SAKKO v. Mst. SHARIFAN 2011 YLR 2815
• JAWAN SAAL v. DPO, DERA GHAZI KHAN 2011 YLR 2821
• MUHAMMAD KHURRAM SHEHZAD v. BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor 2011 YLR 2834
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. State 2011 YLR 2837
• SUGI (PVT.) LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2011 PTD 2839
• JEHAN KHAN v. JEHAN KHAN 2011 YLR 2848

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes