Sections 13 (3) (4) and 193 of the Customs Rules, 2001, Rule 239, 240, 345 (2) and 356 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199, for the private bonded warehouse of the applicant company, after its expiration Was canceled Through the authorities, the applicant has moved the petition for removal of goods under R 356 of the Customs, Rules, 2001, pending appeal against the order of cancellation of the license, but the authorities have removed the provisions of section 13 (3) of the Customs Act. , Refused to allow it without a bank guarantee. Collector of Customs, 1969, has no doubt been granted a license revocation for any breach of license terms. Or in violation of any provision of the Customs Act 1969, or any rule made thereunder, but provided that the licensee is provided with a chance to show cause notice for the proposed cancellation. Could have been canceled. The Collector was authorized to suspend the license if the action was pending under section 13 (3) of the Customs Act, provided that it was regulated under section 13 (4) of the Customs Act, 1969 The cancellation action against them is not pending. Under Section 13 (3) of the Customs Act, 1969, the applicant had shown that no reason was given for the suspension of the license. It is the duty of the government to do everything strictly in accordance with the law and not Arrested or unethical goods were unavailable in the bonded warehouse and unlawful work or delay in the disposal of such goods could result in financial loss for the applicant. T he law was obliged to comply and if any Violated
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
