Sections 302 (c), 302 (6) and 394 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 403, 397 and 35 (2) (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Qatil Amad, voluntarily hurt for committing robbery. The accused, who was convicted in two different cases tried to run the constitutional petition at the same time, was convicted under Section 302 (b). The PPC was sentenced by the Additional Sessions Judge on 249 2001 to 14 years RI, which reduced The RI accused, who was sentenced to 10 years, was also convicted under Section 302. b), PPC and Section 394, PPC in another case registered at a different police station in the same district, on which on 29 7 2002 a different Additional Sessions Judge sentenced to life imprisonment and ten years RI respectively. Was, with this instruction. In order to run it, the accused had prayed that the sentences sentenced to be executed simultaneously in both the above-mentioned cases should be directed simultaneously, without doubt, in both sentences, with the full force of law established independently. But it is related to the same person and the intention of the Legislature to enter and restrict the Code of Conduct in the Criminal Code of Conduct, 1898, which issued Section 403, CRPC High Court to Section 397. According to the importance of the match prepared accordingly, the PC read with Section (35 (?) (a)), the CC was empowered to conclude the accused simultaneously. Order the trial proceedings so that the accused in both cases were punished, therefore, ordered to proceed with the next plea.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
