Sections 516A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 379/411 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Stolen Property Holding No License, Illegal Licensed Weapon Cases The matter related to the Superdry of Property was initially upheld by the Magistrate Sessions Court after the Magistrate Sessions Court heard the petitioner and handed the custody of the bitch to the plaintiff in his FIR. And the defendant admitted in his cross version that the bitch was in the custody of the applicant at the time of the incident and when the same thief Upon that, the Petitioner recognized that he was the last owner of the bitch, which was returned to him after the incident, as claimed by both parties in their own versions before the police respondent, for survival. , The bitch failed to establish her claim to be the last owner of Season C. In the controversial order, ust correctly indicated that the trial was pending and indicated the principles of detention, indicating that the last owner of such property could be detained. I was entitled under Section 516A, CR PC, but it has since. Appropriate claimants and sufficient material were removed from the terms, as there was nothing in the investigative file of the case at the time that an improper injunction was passed in favor of the respondents, which did not appeal the reasoning and logic. Was. The defendant was not challenged by the defendant in his review petition in favor of the applicant, which the Sessions Court denied and wrongly rejected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
