DR. SHOUKAT PERVEZ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT, DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
R11 Estacode, CHAP 1, Senior 7 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Recruitment Theory of Appropriate Expectation Applicable, the misuse of applicant's grievance was that he was selected for the post of question and his prime minister. Had approved. Some other person was appointed to the Prime Minister, the Voltatetti Petitioner was the victim of an arbitrary act, which is also a good example of arbitrary misconduct. The belief could not have been a legitimate expectation, which became a fundamental and enforcing right to aid in clear cases against apparent injustice, when the bereaved had no legal right to claim relief in any way because such a view was public. Can work for power holders to prevent or prevent them from using them. Persons who arbitrarily delegated power and inherently defended power to avoid being subjected to arbitrary misconduct by the authorities was unlawful and unlawful, with the approval of the appointment of the applicant for the post of justice. Upon its proper selection, recommendation and approval, the applicant had the full right to be appointed to the High Court-directed post. As per the approval of the Prime Minister's High Court, the authorities directed the officials to appoint the applicant against the office bearers without issue any further notice of the applicant's appointment notification.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
