Section 302/34 Qatl e amd Definition of Evidence Despite a lengthy cross-examination by the defense, there has been no contradiction in the designation of the suspect with any weapon and attributing the motive to the firearm injuries. of that. The reasons for their presence at the time and location of the incident, which could not be dispersed by the defense during their cross-examination, led to evidence of the prosecution's case being inline and agreeing with each other. As such, he attributed the trust to impressive and reliable wounds. The three suspects were also certified through medical evidence and were told that the medical evidence was substantiated through an ocular account, which is due to the alleged crime of one of the accused, resulting in the prosecution. Expands the trap to include more and more family members, and it has become increasingly suspicious. In the absence of any previous hostility with th, the complaining party took advantage, the accused was told, while the arrest of the remaining two accused was not mysteriously dropped, the testimony of the prosecution witnesses could not be excluded on this basis. That the witnesses are not believed to be related to the accused's involvement. The benefit of the doubt is that the prosecution substantiated the allegations against the remaining two accused, which testified to the credibility and credibility of the eyewitnesses of international importance and also confirmed through medical evidence. The prosecution successfully delivered the culprit to the house of two accused, was properly sentenced and the accused was sentenced
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
