Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Guardian, Right to Appointment of Lawyer Strike During the Family Court proceedings, the right to examine the applicant's witnesses was discontinued, two days after being approved. On two dates, the question of the order, even though the respondents and the lawyer's witnesses were present for the parties, did not move forward because the members of the bar were on strike because the petitioner's petition was not approved, hence the applicant's rights. The closure of the petition on every occasion when the applicant requested a delay or when on the occasion of fact date The absence of any objection to the application members were on strike because the applicant was no objection by the plaintiff was postponed approval. The delay was considered a routine postponement in which no retaliatory action was taken against the applicant, horses of minors were involved and the High Court provided the applicant with an opportunity to examine the respondents' testimony, However, at the expense of cost enforcement, the High Court set aside the order passed by the Guardian Judge and the matter was remanded for cross-recording. Permission to examine respondent's testimony accordingly \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
