Sections 4, 18 and 23 (2) acquisition of land by the Land Referee Court, in which case the landlord's application was raised from Rs. Also awarded by the landlord, the mandatory charge of 15% of the market value was the referee court's claim for the future potential of the disputed land and the location of the land that was adjacent to a tourist facility. Did not Facilities accuracy authorities failed to produce any documentary evidence that shows the market price at less than Rs 100,000 per kanal The Land Acquisition Collector failed to consider all the factors while determining the amount of compensation. Salt was included in the landlord's question of injury was located in an underground income property that was already a well-developed tourist destination, with potential future High Court appeals and compensation money. Raised up to Rs 110, 000 per kernel \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
