MUHAMMAD AMIN BHATTI versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF PUNJAB POLICE
Implementing the decision of the Civil Service Promotion Services Tribunal, the constitutional petition of Arts 199 and 212, did not approach the High Court to consider in its favor publicity for publicity or to make a complaint that it He was treated unfairly or illegally. The difficulty and significance of the petitioner's complaint was that the service tribunal's decisions, which were also upheld by the Supreme Court, were made under Article 1212 of the Constitution, that the service tribunal was not being enforced or implemented. And its determination was taken over by jurisdiction. Applicant's Complaint judgment Determines its grievances through its decision-making decision, which finalizes the parties' rights for implementation. The law will not be affected by any change, thereafter on the principle that a person should not be expelled twice for the same reason of action, unless it is clear and unambiguous in his subsequent litigation. Not to be construed as a restriction. According to the decision of the Service Tribunal, after which the constitution request was approved, the constitution request was approved, and the matter must be taken in the light of the matter and in the light of that the matter should be placed before the Public Promotion Committee. ? Attempts have been made to implement the observations / direction given by the service tribunal in its decision. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
