MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KHARIAN DISTRICT GUJRAT
Article 324/148/149/109 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Article 571 A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Riot Equipped with Deadly Weapons, Constitutional Petition to Prohibit Evidence, Closes Evidence of Prosecution The previous record discloses that hearing of the statements of the prosecution witnesses on various dates could not be recorded because of the absence of the accused before the trial magistrate in the court to summon the witnesses through a non-bailable warrant. Was issuing orders, without confirmation and validation. In fact, the trial court, which issued and presented the witnesses, did not take any stringent action such as linking the properties of the prosecution witnesses under Section 87/87/88, CRPC trial courts Attending and dealing with them were not helpless. The implementing agencies, which neglected to pay the applicant's duties, were an injured person in this case, and they sought to convert the High Forum's constitutional petition into a petition under section 555A, CR PC in the interest of justice. Was able to overcome previously unseen orders. The applicant was instructed to present all the private witnesses to the trial court within a certain period of time in the trial, asking the trial court to take all possible steps to obtain the presence of the prosecution witnesses. So that the trial could potentially be concluded. Within a month the application was allowed under \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
