Sections 8 and 42 of the Gift Suit to take possession of the declaration and the ownership that one defendant sold his property to him through a registered sale deed and conveyed it to the other defendant through the said lawyer and alteration. The separatists were fake plaintiffs who demanded termination. The same defendants filed a lawsuit and filed a statement, while one of the defendants acknowledged the claims of the plaintiffs while one of the defendants filed statements against the plaintiffs on that basis. Also claimed that he was the owner of the disputed property because of the alleged sale. And the trial court dismissed the claims of the defendants, while the trial court's decision and decree were upheld, dismissing the defendants' strong verdicts and the case filed in the appeal court. It has been stated that the defendants have neither mentioned the plaintiff nor made any statement in the court. When the evidence about the delivery of the offer, acceptance and possession of the t was a gift; the mere possession did not prove the reality of the gift. Nor was it proved by the evidence that the disputed property was never gifted. Neither was the two courts below to discuss any aspect of the matter that was necessary for the establishment of a legitimate gift. However, the mere admission of a gift change cannot by any means be said that a valid gift was made below. Had committed illegal acts by declaring in favor of them. The defendants were allowed by the High Court and both counts
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
