Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

Sections 13 and 13 An eviction request The trial court approved the default request for payment of rent to a new owner / landlord. The appellate court dismissed the tenant's appeal. The tenant contended that the application for the removal of the title suit between the new and previous owners of the damaged property is barred. The owners / landlords stepped into the shoes of the previous owners / landlords; notice of the change of ownership was properly sent to the tenant courts to ensure that the landlord and tenant had a relationship with the new owners and the tenant tenant. Was requested. Not manageable during deferment between new and previous owners, tenant did not pay rent without substance ?? Appeal dismissed despite knowledge of damaged property ownership change

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• SALIM DAD KHAN v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 2011 YLR 540
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. NATIONAL DATABASE REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Chairman 2011 MLD 541
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2011 YLR 543
• Rana NASARULLAH v. State 2011 PLD 544
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. Mst. NOOR MAI 2011 MLD 547
• Mst. CHOTO v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 2011 PLD 548
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KHARIAN DISTRICT GUJRAT 2011 PLD 551
• MUHAMMAD IDREES v. State 2011 PCrLJ 552

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

divorce advocates from Umer Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes