Section 13 (3) (ii) (4) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to evict a tenant according to the personal need of the landlord The landlord tried to evict the tenant on the land that his son had been subjected to. The house is essential for the occupation of. Both the tenant controller and the appellate authority ordered the tenant to evict the landlord with sufficient evidence; the tenant himself had personally proved that the landlord's son was not occupying a separate shop. Or said that while doing freelance business in the premises, the tenant failed to prove that any other shop in the landlord's market was empty, even if a shop was empty, this aspect of the matter was not enough. That the landlord's needs are not being met. Encouragement, because if it fails to take over at this time, we have been tried by the landlord within a specified period of time to vacate under section 13 (4) of ours. St. Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was a remedy for the tenant to recover possession. And the landlord can be punished for not taking possession of the home because the landlord personally appeared before the tenant and gave a statement on the oath, so he personally succeeded in his personal need. Had proven together and the tenant had failed to meet the urgent need of the landlord finding both tribunals down, no material illegal or irregularities, misreading of evidence or false evidence, numerous legal jurisdiction. , Retained
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
