Find a Lawyer

MST. ANEETA versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatil Im Bell, the grant of further inquiry was imposed on a man and three women for the commission of a crime complaint in their supplemental statement which stated That she testified that the plastic bag was described by a female witness with male accusers, but did not name the female suspect's association, unless it was confirmed at trial by independent evidence. So the issue of women is required. Further inquiries were made because no witnesses had named the accused in the name

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• QAMAR ZAMN v. Haji KHAN RAZIQ 2011 CLC 717
• GUL JEHAN alias KHAN v. FAIZULLAH KHAN 2011 MLD 725
• Haji MUHAMMAD AYAZ KHAN v. Malik KHAN AYAZ KHAN 2011 CLD 727
• MUHAMMAD JAVED v. State 2011 YLR 732
• MUHAMMAD NASIR v. ABDUL HAKIM KHAN 2011 CLC 748
• INAYAT KHAN v. ZAHID 2011 YLR 761
• JAN MUHAMMAD v. Mst. HUSSAN ZEILAT 2011 MLD 762
• SARFARAZ KHAN v. WAPDA through Chairman 2011 CLC 765

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

power of attorney advocate Tank lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes