Section 9 (c) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 4 Define evidence in drug possession. Prosecuting witnesses who had no nexus with drug recovery were unable to link the allegedly recovered banned piece with anyone. None of the witnesses was able to state that each of the accused admitted in his statement to the Investigation Officer that he did not record the statement of anyone who was doing business with the market. The omnibus retrieval was raided without any specific evidence, could not be attributed to any one of the accused and could not be attributed to the recovery from the various cabins, however, there was no shortage of evidence in the record. However, the actual recovery from each cabin police was revealed. A large amount of illegal articles were shown which were tested positive by the forensic science lab but none of them could be attributed to the accused and they were charged, separated, they were released. He was acquitted of his charges and was released. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
