Section 2 (2 (b) / 4 324/34/7 337F (i) Assessing the evidence due to the assassination attempt, and the reason for the claim) The general intention was to assign the firing victim to the accused. , While the current accused complainant was effectively charged with firing that the prosecution had tried to prove his case on the basis of impressive evidence of trust against the accused accused of sharing a common intention in the murder case. Failure, the combined intent of committing the murder, was a fact that can be estimated. Depending on the course of action and the conduct of the accused, The accused, along with several sporadic or fire shots, with the element of mental advertising, did not commit the murder of the accused in the facts and circumstances of the case, but was wrongly convicted and unlawfully convicted and punished. Since the prosecution was able to prove its case against the accused accused of firing on the complainant, he was seriously injured in the trial. Sections 24 & 24 & 7 337F (i), pp. The accused, convicted and convicted under Section 2302, PPC, were kept separate, while the rest of the sentence and Sentence has been registered under section 337 242424/7 F (i). ), PPC, was retained
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
