Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the suit, declaration and permanent injunction suit were finally decided by the trial court and the appellate court. And the defendant was in a marital bond and the plaintiff's wife was appointed as the plaintiff / her husband as their general counsel. The registered process later, the marital relationship between the spouses ended, the record in relation to the cancellation of the Power of Attorney was silent, however, the sale could not be made so lightly by the defendant. And this cannot be considered normal, especially when the only relationship between the two is over. Under the law, a lawyer using the Date of Attorney in the name of his brother will require the principal's consent, approval and consent, in consideration of selling a lawyer for Rs 1,065,00. He wanted to transfer the property in the name of his closest relative to the plaintiff, when the principal, his ex-wife, lost trust / trust because of the end of the marriage between them, so he could actually sell the property inside the sale. Was bound to prove. After the proper examination of the evidence with the knowledge and permission of the principal defendant, he failed to exclude the two courts below his burden, regarding the scope of the plaintiff's arguments in both courts, based on the proper scrutiny of the evidence, The right to intervene was rightly justified by the High Court. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
