Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALTAF KHAN versus STATE

Attempts to compile Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/148/149 Qital Ahmed bail, medical reports of the further investigative grant complainant and other injured person revealed that the injured leg There are injuries. The case of the accused, which was an unimportant part of the bodies, came under the scope of inquiry, they were declared entitled to bail, the accused were admitted to bail.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• ASMATULLAH v. State 2011 YLR 1600
• NEEL SHAH v. State 2011 YLR 1611
• QASIM SHAH v. Mst. SHAHNAZ BEGUM 2011 MLD 1613
• RAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1623
• RAHEEM KHAN v. State 2011 YLR 1636
• ZAKIR MUNEER v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), ABBOTTABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 1651
• MAHMOOD v. State 2011 YLR 1652
• MUHAMMAD NASIR v. ABDUR RASHID 2011 MLD 1662

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Toru lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes