Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus ASHIQ BADSHAH OR ZAHAWAR SHAH

During the hearing of the petition for review under Section 115, jurisdiction, section 115 of the exercise, the High Court had to satisfy itself on three issues. The lower court's ruling was within its jurisdiction. That was a case in which the court should exercise jurisdiction. And that, exercising jurisdiction, the court did not take unlawful action

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• ALI MUHAMMAD JAN v. Mst. SURIYA BEGUM 2011 YLR 1559
• AZAD KHAN v. Haji MUHAMMAD USMAN 2011 MLD 1570
• MUHAMMAD HASHIM v. ABDUL QAYYUM 2011 CLC 1579
• Malik MUMTAZ KHAN v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PAKISTAN 2011 CLC 1586
• ASMATULLAH v. State 2011 YLR 1600
• NEEL SHAH v. State 2011 YLR 1611
• QASIM SHAH v. Mst. SHAHNAZ BEGUM 2011 MLD 1613
• RAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1623

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

inheritance advocates near Chak Jhumra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes