Articles 302 (b) / 109 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 164 && Q 364 Law of Conviction (of 10 of 1984 of the), Arts & 43 & 90 90 Counsel for the accused confessing to the evidence Claimed that the participant was acquitted as the accused, the accused could not be convicted on the same evidence. The dispute was overturned because the accused's case was not the same as that of the participant, because the accompanying accused had gone before the competent court. Did not confess my crime. After the accused had confessed to his crime, within 24 hours of his arrest by a competent Judicial Magistrate, the Judicial Judge, after placing all necessary and necessary questions in accordance with the High Court Rules and issuing the required certificate. The confessional statement of the accused was recorded by the magistrate. According to Section 646464, the CCP had attached such certificate under Article 9090 under the Conan evidence, that such confessional statement of the accused should be taken as evidence against the accused under Article 43 of the Convention of Evidence Yes, nothing was available on the 1984 record. The confession was made by the accused in guilt, pressure, coercion, hardship or greed, but this free, honest and voluntary confession statement was proved by medical evidence. And the prosecution's independent and impartial witnesses backed the crime. Out of the 30 bore vacancies were sent to the Spot Weapons Expert and the weapons expert's report was positive, the accused's murder charge was proved beyond any doubt against the trial court, in which case the accused was sentenced and He was justified in executing and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
