Sections 2?2 (b) and 2Q A report relating to the disappearance of the deceased and the evidence of the crime was filed after the deceased's disappearance and after the deceased's recovery, neither the complainant nor the prosecutor. No explanation has been given that the report was not filed after the prosecution's witness and the deceased's statement of execution, which showed that the initial investigation, recovery, consultation and negotiation between the police and the complaining party. This report was presented overnight. No eyewitness to the incident was able to testify against the accused only on the indictment, the alleged weapon of crime, ick pecks, was recovered from the livestock of the accused in the presence of the prosecution witness, which led to Peck being human. No blood stains were found. No one was seen n The placing of the pike was not on the record in the hand of the accused to show that the shed of cattle was where it was stated that the Peckes accused had exclusively with the accused. Which did not prove to own and own a cattle shed. No other contentious circumstance was available on record to link the prosecution accused to the commission of the crime until someone had seen the deceased in the company of the suspect until his disappearance, Will not prove. The allegations against the accused cannot be proved merely in the absence of an account and strong circumstances, and the supporter of the evidence is acquitted by the accused on the basis of the same allegation and motive on the part of the accused under section 265 Cr, CRPC. Was done. Impressive evidence of any conviction for a crime
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
