Section 324 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-Xin of 1965), Section 13 The story presented by the prosecution seeking to commit a fine and possessing unlicensed weapons does not reflect any of the acts intended to commit Can be worth the effort. The PPC record of the case would prove to be punishable under section 324, the matter was investigated according to the statement of the Investigation Officer of the Star Witness, which was filled with material contradictions, which were rarely Could have been believed. Relevant timing was suspected Other witnesses were not presented In light of the site plan, the entire evidence will tell the prosecution's story that the accused's licensed rifle was snatched from his daughter by the complainant, Came together as well as without foundation. When the story did not prove to be a rifle snatched from the accused, Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, became a question mark against the accused, the prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused, its culprit and conviction, Isolated, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
