Find a Lawyer

AMIR-UR-REHMAN versus SHER ALI

Under the Section 42 trial, the trial court remanded the appellate court with partial rejection of the trial court's ruling and an order granting both parties the opportunity to file five additional matters and to present evidence. What. According to the parties' requests / the appellate court framed the cases which the trial court on the occasion of the parties dismissed / failed in the remand of the case to record the evidence for the parties to the dispute decision at the end. Was legal in the law. The trial was legally binding on the defendants' decision further The appellate court remanded the case according to law to decide on the request for an application for additional evidence before further proceedings. , The requests were dismissed within the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• Mir QASIM KHAN v. Syed ZAFAR ALI SHAH 2011 YLR 816
• ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN v. UMAR ALI SHAH 2011 MLD 825
• ISRAFEEL v. State 2011 YLR 837
• SHER AZAM v. State 2011 PCrLJ 844
• SHAD MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 MLD 852
• SAEED AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ 2011 YLR 855
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL KHAN v. Mst. HAJRA BIBI 2011 YLR 861
• MINHAJUDDIN v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PESHAWAR 2011 PTD 862

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

when you need a advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes