SYED TABARAK HUSSAIN SHAH versus ZIL-E-HASNAIN SHAH
Sections 191919, 202020, 6 466 and 8 468 Criminal Code of Conduct (V of 1898) A joint objection, in relation to the age of the accused in a criminal case, constitutes overriding, so as to be based on a pretrial hearing. After examining the material brought to the record to benefit the accused, it was concluded that the prosecution had failed to prove their case against the accused and they were acquitted by unwanted verdict. The relevant register, which was allegedly overturned, was not a public document and had no significance and remained with the complainant for about fifteen days before the accused was registered. Thus, it was not clear which of the complainants had altered the entries themselves in the statement of the complainant, who himself had made the prosecution's testimony, indicating that no one in connection with the charges leveled against them. Evidence not available. According to both dates, the alleged altered date was benefited by the accused, the relevant accused was underage; in any case, none of the accused persons, under the circumstances, was the beneficiary of the alleged change in the register. I, the trial court, failed to prove his case against reasonable doubt that the accused / respondents trial court correctly appreciated the evidence brought to the record and in the circumstances, the defendants were badly acquitted. Had done.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
