MUHAMMAD KHAN ALIAS KHALIFA versus HAYATULLAH KHAN
Section 332 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Damaged Constitution Petitioner Applicant / Complainant requested the Investigation Officer to report to the Magistrate's Investigation Officer the accuracy weapon expert, which was in accordance with the prosecution's case. Misrepresentation was made in favor of The accused magistrate agreed to the report of the investigating officer without the use of his judicial mind on the facts of the case and to affirm the possession of the trial court's powers by inquiry without notice to the applicant / complainant Investigation Officer. Authorization was not granted The officer and magistrate could not be retained by any standard of judicial scrutiny; the trial was always subject to separation, verification and verification by the court, without giving opportunity to the opponents. The action could not have been encouraged by the magistrate. In the administrative capacity, he was required to apply his free mind and consider all aspects of the matter which were dismissed by the investigating officer and the order passed by the magistrate, without any legal authority and Nor was the High Court affected by any kind of effect. The constitutional request for the police to hand over the matter to another neutral investigating officer was accepted in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
