Find a Lawyer

HAMID YOUSAF versus STATE

The defendant had no knowledge of the definition of evidence containing Section 489C counterfeit currency notes, nor had any reason to believe that the counterfeit currency notes were in fact fake or fraudulent. And he did not intend to use it as a real thing. Or that it could be used as a substantive and essential requirement of the law; in the circumstances, it was not fulfilled; the prosecution failed to meet the requirement of section 489C, PPC, The defendant was convicted for maintaining the trial and sentencing of the trial court. Regardless of its mere possession and then the accessories of 5 489C, the PPC proceeded with an unclean verdict, which was not lasting and the Syed verdict was set aside and the accused acquitted of his charge. And he was released.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• NAWAB KHAN v. D.C.O. POLITICAL AGENT 2011 PLD 167
• Haji INAYAT KHAN v. BAKHT MUNIR JAN 2011 MLD 169
• IZZAT KHAN v. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2011 PLC 171
• SHAD MUHAMMAD KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. 2011 PLD 172
• Syed TABARAK HUSSAIN SHAH v. ZIL-E-HASNAIN SHAH 2011 YLR 176
• GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PUKHTOONKHWA through Secretary, B.O.R. v. Mst. KHAISTA JANA alias BILQUIS KHISRO 2011 PLD 178
• MUHAMMAD KHAN alias KHALIFA v. HAYATULLAH KHAN 2011 MLD 181
• Haji HAFEEZ ULLAH v. PERSONAL OFFICER (SECURITY DIVISION), KARACHI 2011 PLC 184

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

list of supreme court advocates from Sangote lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes