TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION versus FRONTIER SUBMERSIBLE ENGINEERING AND ELECTRIC WORKS
Section 96 (2), O. VIII, R10 and OIX, R7 Former party decree against attacking defendant's defense for non-submission of written statement, allegation of failure of the plaintiff and recording of evidence of the plaintiff. I dismiss the defendant's request after the trial court passed the ex-parte order after the trial court heard the arguments of the plaintiff's appeal dismissed by the trial court. Defendant's conduct correctly denied jurisdiction in his favor The record shows that the defendant's office was initially interested in presenting any reasonable and serious opposition to the defendant's claim. And his lawyer was found absent on numerous occasions. Without a legal excuse, the court did not take the opportunity to examine the plaintiff's witnesses, but their position was left unsatisfactory, so the plaintiff's behavior was a collective offense by him. There was a hint, and the reason for such an unwanted attitude and guilt was that the defendant knew that he could not receive the award after the judgment in the case. In the execution of the execution for the execution of the death penalty, it would be clear from the defendant's agreement that the plaintiff had no doubt in claiming the claim. Delivery of an unknown order to was not prevented. For whatever reason the above courts were not beyond the jurisdiction to approve the disqualification order by participating in judicial proceedings beyond its control.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
