Section 302 (b) / 324/337 F (i) / 337 F (ii) / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 239 Qatl e amd, Qatl e AMd, and charges of proof of dementia and abuse Accusations were made against three accused under separate heads. That is, to cause murder. Attempts to commit a fine and injure the injured (Damia and Badiyah) All the accused allegedly committed multiple offenses in the same transaction, it is said that the accused can be tried together with the accused. And the case of framing charges against the accused will be covered under section 239. The CCP charge, in these circumstances, was properly charged by the trial court against the accused, the ocular evidence agreed with the other circumstances of the case and it was free of any contradiction and contradiction, the evidence was straightforward, true and The faith-bearing witness had to go a long way, but he remained in his position. The defense did not bring forth any evil to prove them hostage, or falsely implicated the defendant with a wrongful will, saying the evidence of the witness could be safely relied upon. Rejecting the two witnesses and not presenting the other three injured witnesses will not affect the litigation, as the evidence of the complainant appearing as eyewitness was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused. Fifteen cases were also recovered by the CBI and the investigating officer also recovered the bodies of the two victims and recovered the weapons in connection with the investigation by Kalashnikov and the forensic science laboratory.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
