Section 302 (b) / 324/148/149 Qatiel Ahmed and an attempt to honor the murder were filed immediately by the FIR, due to non-production of the brother of one of the brother of the deceased and injured passersby. It could not be the basis for throwing. While the prosecution presented strong evidence to prove the accused's guilt, he could not have imagined that he had arrived at the scene with the intent to fight with the accused, the prosecution's case. Came into existence. The so-called cross case that eventually gave evidence of the presence of the accused on the spot, witnesses testified, sealed the injuries on his person, whose testimony was natural and credible, minor contradictions and even exaggerated opinions could not be overcome. Is. The potential power of ocular testimony, especially when such evidence was proven through medical evidence, motivation, and conviction of all co-accused. Ed, under the circumstances, witnesses' accounts, the presence of the accused from the site plan and the presence of the injured complainant and the recovery of blood and emptiness by chance, Medical Report, Medical Legal Report in relation to the injured complainant On the spot charge against the accused established by the prosecution, the trial court properly sentenced the accused and sentenced him, in the presence of any unlawful interference or instability in the improper judgment. , It was retained.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
