Find a Lawyer

ALI MUHAMMAD JAN versus MST. SURIYA BEGUM

O VII, R 2 & O XLI, R 1 Appeal for receipt of money as a necessary party in appeal after period of appeal against original judgment and order, which appeals to the extent of respondent / daughter Ineligible appeals were not only banned, but also appeals were filed against other unqualified defendants; the merit was properly heard by the trial court. Appreciated the evidence of the parties and decided all matters in light of the evidence recorded during the trial and the relevant provisions of the appeal were excluded.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR v. ADALAT KHAN 2011 YLR 1523
• GHULAM BIBI v. HAMIDULLAH 2011 MLD 1529
• Mst. NAYYAR NAHEED v. Malik ZAHEER ULLAH 2011 YLR 1535
• WAJIHA alias KHAN SHEERIN v. MUHAMMAD NIAZ KHAN 17 2011 MLD 1548
• AZAD KHAN v. Haji MUHAMMAD USMAN 2011 MLD 1570
• MUHAMMAD HASHIM v. ABDUL QAYYUM 2011 CLC 1579
• Malik MUMTAZ KHAN v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PAKISTAN 2011 CLC 1586
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQ v. ASHIQ BADSHAH or ZAHAWAR SHAH 2011 CLD 1586

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

advocate from Shamsabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes