The names of the accused persons were disclosed in their statement under Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 6565B abduction guarantee, application for alleged abduction, section 6464, CRPC Who participated in the alleged incident, but his mother did not mention in her report, which she filed after the delay of 10/2 hours, records of the names showed The brother of the alleged kidnapper was in the house at the time of the alleged incident, but he did not resist the kidnapping. Neither his sister nor the police immediately reported it to the police. The alleged kidnapper had alleged that he had not charged the commission of adultery, there was a previous rivalry between the parties, the matter is further investigated, the accused were legally entitled to his extension on bail, bail. There were no conditions for cancellation of the complainant, and it was yet to be proved by the complainant that the allegations leveled against the accused were based on facts which were not in the record. No evidence was presented that could have been considered a reasonable and substantive basis for the cancellation of the bail so that the complainant's legal position on threatening or tampering with the evidence could be given legal cover. There is no record of the suspect's prior involvement. Charges were granted for the sanction and cancellation of the offense in the application bail, or the nature was completely different and different; the complainant failed to prove his request through any material, the unknown order was his Was not on the face Guarantee approval rules
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
