Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 411 / 120B Against Property (Enforcement Hood Ordinance Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Receiving stolen property, criminal conspiracy and forcible bail) , Two pieces of evidence were against the two accused, in the form of a recovery memo drawn on the identification of the other co-accused, in which a 12 bore shotgun was recovered from the two bore suspects. There was a statement from the other co-accused under Sec 161, CCP identified the recovery of the shotgun by the other co-accused and there is no evidence to show that the shotgun was not, by both the accused. Owned by either of the two. The defendant's statement had no identifiable value for the other accomplices listed under Section 161, CRPC, because he had saved his skin and two accused were involved in the case, after the bail was granted to the three co-accused. The rule of temperament also applied to this matter. The two accused were not named in the FIR and no arrest parade was held to identify the complainant after their arrest; any kind of session by any of the accused. Was not applied, in these circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
