Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B Abduction Guarantee, the grant of further inquiry to the complainant, states that the accused was committing adultery with the allegedly abducted woman. Had infected the marriage with the affected woman who had already been given. In his statement recorded under Section 161 of the Complainant to the Marriage Person, the alleged abductor with whom the alleged abductor mentioned his daughter's engagement and did not mention that anyone was married. The first alleged abductee to be abducted with someone was not in fact a marriage. , But was engaged; and there was a difference between `marriage 'and' engagement ', but the alleged abductor at the time of the incident was not final, since he was over 18 years old and he was a judge himself. If she can voluntarily enter into the right marriage. It is believed that the accused's second marriage with the alleged kidnapper has been disputed, after which the appropriate forum will decide the case of the Family Court as the criminal court was unable to take jurisdiction in the case of the alleged kidnapper's father. And her first alleged husband did not file a lawsuit. Marriage Concerns, which led to suspicion that the alleged abductor appeared in the trial court and recorded her statement that she voluntarily entered into a marriage with the accused and was never abducted. He could not be contacted, in connection with the allegations. The crime for which they are charged, unless certain facts are proved in the trial phase against them.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
