Section 5, Schedule [as amended Video Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002)] and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal for Recovery, Recovery Allowance and Dover Articles Judgment by a Family Court ? The claimant and grant him, five tola gold jewelry or his market value of five marla separately. Maintenance for five months at a monthly rate of Rs 2000 per month; Rs 3000 per month maintenance; Under the condition that the claimant will resume his marital duties from the articles of the plaintiff, the appellate court appealed to the defendant. Was accepted to the extent that the house and house containing the gold jewelry were set aside, while past care and future allowances were retained by the plaintiff claiming that an agreement was made on Dover 39 2006. Was settled, while the marriage between the parties was made in the Appellate Court in 2002, which gave the Judge Family Court legal jurisdiction R was misunderstood under which it was deemed to have read Section 5 with Part 1 of the Schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which, in accordance with the Section Section of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, 1 is settled, shall decide on item No. 9 in the jurisdiction of the Family Court. Part 1 of the Schedule increased the scope and jurisdiction of the Judge Family Court to decide on all of the matters described, including matters related to the wife's claim regarding her current property, which was sought by the appellate court. Besides, the family court of the judge was forbidden to make a decision on the matter of the agreement, totally wrong and against the clear schedule provisions.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
