Section 5, Schedule, Section 9 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Applicant Applicant, defendant in an earlier case for marital rights, with additional prayer of interim restitution allowance under Section 17A of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act. Submitting a written statement claiming rehabilitation. 1964 was allowed by the Family Court and the High Court, which passed the Family Court decision in the constitutional petition after which the husband withdrew his claim for the restoration of marital rights, and upon his dismissal, we The written statement that was filed was also rejected and was not fit to be heard: after the amendment to the relevant provisions of section 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, written by one or the other party. The statement was to be given to the claimant, in the present case the claimant withdrew. The suit, the proper way for the Family Court, was to make the written statement considered to the plaintiff and the plaintiff; and to order the transfer of the parties from the parties to the plaintiff and vice versa, The family court failed to apply its mind and did not take appropriate action and did not allow the course under which the defendant proposed. At the behest of the Family Court, the wife filed a new case and also prayed for a provisional restitution allowance, which was denied, however, if the husband feared that tomorrow if the recovery allowance acquisition case would be dismissed or dismissed. If made, the amount paid will be recovered. Difficult; Family Court Husband In This Situation As Pending Interim Recovery Allowance
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
